Well, at least human behavior in regard to
something that is familiar seem to be oxymoronic (Is that a word?)
Of course familiar is derived from the same
roots as the word family and has meaning along the lines of: intimate, well acquainted, or
recognizable.
What intrigues me is the polar or opposite
responses we as humans have toward things which are familiar.
On the one hand, familiarity breeds
contempt.
We tend to devalue that which is common place
or familiar to us. We take for granted
that which we have and are drawn to what we don’t. This is seen in physics
(opposites attract), in relationships (again – opposites, as well as taking for
granted the family and friends we interact with every day), in trends and
fashions (the familiar is considered old-fashioned whereas the new and changing
is fashionable), and in motives (rebelling against what is – as though driven to
break away into something new).
On the other hand, familiarity creates
loyalty.
We tend to have confidence in what we already
know or are comfortable around environments that are familiar to us. It is our safety net and comfort zone. This can be seen in the woman who leaves one
dysfunctional relationship to start a new one with the same caliber of
guy. It is all she knows and the pain
associated there is not as frightening as the pain of trying something
different. It can be seen in the instinctive
fight against new ideas and philosophies that are foreign to us. It can be seen in traditions that are
repeated for generations – sometimes without any thought as to its original
purpose or if that purpose is pertinent now.
It can be seen in our preferences and choices, because of our previous
exposure to it (whatever it may be – I’m always amused that whenever a
different version of a movie or storyline come along, people usually prefer
whichever version they were exposed to first.)
That seems oxymoronic, or contradictory, to
me. We respond with either contempt… or loyalty… to that which is familiar.
So on the reverse, we respond with either loyalty or contempt to that
which is unfamiliar. Now that seems truly
moronic to me.
I started these musings over this summer where
I learned the following powerful concept:
We
tend to have CONFIDENCE in that which is most FAMILIAR
………even
if it is wrong.
Our confidence isn’t based on logical
deductions. It obviously isn’t based on
some moral guideline or inner guidance system.
It isn’t based on historical cycles or trusting a higher authority or
power. And it certainly isn’t based on
force or compulsion…….. But simply on
familiarity.
And so I began to question what my confidences
are based on, what they should be based on, as well as become aware of how
familiarity has worked in my life. The
following incidents may illustrate my experience.
Awhile ago, I had been looking for a
particular message through contemporary music.
Since I was unfamiliar with so many of the popular songs, I began listening with increased interest and questioning the meaning and words of each song that came on the radio. Needless to say, my teens were enjoying the frequent exposure to that style of music – in the car, while doing work around the house, while exercising, etc. It didn’t take long before I started recognizing and enjoying much of the music around me.
Since I was unfamiliar with so many of the popular songs, I began listening with increased interest and questioning the meaning and words of each song that came on the radio. Needless to say, my teens were enjoying the frequent exposure to that style of music – in the car, while doing work around the house, while exercising, etc. It didn’t take long before I started recognizing and enjoying much of the music around me.
Then an ironic thing happened. We were driving in the car, as a family, with
the radio on. My husband, who sits in a
truck most every day – all day, and over time had become disenchanted with pop
radio and even most of talk radio, preferring instead audio books. Anyway,
during a song I had really come to enjoy, he changed it to a station which plays
LDS songs, hymns, and devotional addresses.
I was surprised to realize that I was annoyed by his interference and
even more surprised that I was uncomfortable with this style of music on a day
other than the Sabbath. Music that just
months before was perfectly fine and even preferred. Well, that was a red flag. I had allowed myself overexposure to a medium
that had altered my very nature. My
familiarity had changed.
On another occasion, my friend loaned me a
movie by Sherwood productions called ‘Facing
the Giants’ with a notification that it was ‘very Christian’. We watched the movie as
a family and sure enough the ‘Christian’ parts were fairly uncomfortable to me. Not that I disbelieved anything they said, rather that it didn’t seem real in a high school situation. It certainly wasn’t real in my high school experience. Like people would ever really talk like that. It had a born-again feeling to it that I wasn’t comfortable with and the acting wasn’t that great. I couldn’t put my finger on it but it just didn’t feel right. It was unfamiliar. I returned the movie and didn’t think anything of it. On another occasion I ran across another Sherwood Production film called ‘Fireproof’. A similar thing happened, but not as intense this time. However, the message of building a strong marriage was so powerful and inspiring, that we watched it again…, and again…, and again. By now, I had whet my appetite for inspiring movies. So I watched ‘Courageous’ and then ‘Flywheel’. I was hooked. I bought all of these movies, and now I cannot believe that I wasn’t impressed or thought it was bad acting the first time I saw these. I did a complete 180 degrees from my first impression based on my familiarity.
Recently, my son put himself into a
potentially fatal position through familiarity.
He’s a diabetic and has been since he was one year old. And I’m afraid to say that he has managed his
blood sugars fairly poorly. He has
become quite accustomed to really high blood glucose readings and may have some
rebellion toward the whole diabetic thing.
And since he’s had high blood sugars for so long and they are so
frequent – he doesn’t pay attention to the warning signs like he should. With puberty setting in it affects his sugars
even more. Well, evidently he had
sustained high readings and he wasn’t coming down. Soon he started vomiting and his breathing
was quite irregular. We found that he
was in Ketoacidosis which could very well have ended his life that night if we
didn’t start flushing the acidic toxins out of his system (which was
challenging to do when he vomited all the fluids we put in). Another bad for the effects of
familiarity.
a family and sure enough the ‘Christian’ parts were fairly uncomfortable to me. Not that I disbelieved anything they said, rather that it didn’t seem real in a high school situation. It certainly wasn’t real in my high school experience. Like people would ever really talk like that. It had a born-again feeling to it that I wasn’t comfortable with and the acting wasn’t that great. I couldn’t put my finger on it but it just didn’t feel right. It was unfamiliar. I returned the movie and didn’t think anything of it. On another occasion I ran across another Sherwood Production film called ‘Fireproof’. A similar thing happened, but not as intense this time. However, the message of building a strong marriage was so powerful and inspiring, that we watched it again…, and again…, and again. By now, I had whet my appetite for inspiring movies. So I watched ‘Courageous’ and then ‘Flywheel’. I was hooked. I bought all of these movies, and now I cannot believe that I wasn’t impressed or thought it was bad acting the first time I saw these. I did a complete 180 degrees from my first impression based on my familiarity.
I did the same thing with music. I made a conscious choice to only listen to a
certain type of music, especially in the mornings before school. Soon I overcame my discomfort with it and am
choosing what I want to be familiar with.
A similar situation has applied in my own
home. I have, what you might say, a
chaotic type of lifestyle. Now…. I’m not
claiming to have that be my preference but it is what I have. Many times something breaks and needs
repaired or I’m in the middle of a project or simply something needs to be put
away – but I don’t have time right this second to attend to it. I’m not lazy –
just fairly busy. Well, that something
that has been put on the back burner, sits there for an unidentified amount of
time. And then when I do have a moment to
attend to a non-urgent matter, I’m so familiar with the chaos and clutter that
it doesn’t occur to me to fix it until I’m experiencing a greater deal of emotional
discomfort. And since I’m a high
tolerance person, I hate to admit that I experience a lot of unnecessary pain. Familiarity definitely worked to my
disadvantage here.
In each of these cases, contempt had (or hopefully
will have) turned to loyalty. I’m
fascinated not only with the power of familiarity, but also that we can CHOOSE
what we want to become familiar with. In
the case of chaotic lifestyle or poor health choices, we can make choices so
that we are loyal toward or comfortable with order in the home and targeted
blood sugars. We can choose our
familiarity, our comfort zone, our very nature.
That’s a powerful concept.
In regard to
societal norms, there is a lot of ideas and exposure to items that I’d rather
not become familiar and comfortable with.
Such things as tolerance for alternative lifestyles or corruption in our
government. Can I change these things by
my own efforts. No, Not at all – change
only happens through unity. But I can
choose to not accept them as the societal norms. Not in some denial or self-righteous effort –
but a choice of non-(over)exposure. It
has two effects. I am in charge of my
own environment and by so doing, resist uniting with others of their acceptance
(it’s not the change I want to support).
And if by some chance others choose the same as me, we create our own
unity and force for good – thus change that I am willing to support. I choose… and live… what I want to be
familiar with.
Just as a side note.
One of the definitions
of familiar also caught my attention. It
was in regard to the term ‘familiar spirits’.
This is generally referring to evil or unclean spirits. I
guess I can understand that reference since Satan and his followers are really
brothers and sisters who chose not to follow our Heavenly Father’s plan. They are familiar to our spirits. We were intimate, well acquainted, and now in
this mortality, they are vaguely recognizable.
But I have no desire to be loyal to them. So I choose contempt or familiarity to their
absence.
Conversely, I AM desiring to be loyal to the
Lord’s spirit and his guardian angels. I
welcome familiarity with their influence, even at a time when the rest of the
world seems to choose contempt toward (or disassociation from their influence
by denying their very existence). By
choosing familiarity with the righteous forces on the other side of the veil,
my familiarity will create increased access to their power and influence.